# Session outputs — complete together at the end of each session Three shared output packs. Not advance submissions. Name a session note owner, capture approved points during the session, then review, approve and export together at its close. # Session 1 output · Success & alignment maps **Session 1 output · Finalise together at the session’s close** During Session 1: the named note owner captures only approved summaries and provisional decisions. At the close: review this pack together, confirm agreement or record differences, check actions have owners and dates, and approve the shared version. The note owner then exports and circulates only that approved version. This pack is not a pre-work submission. Participant / note owner: __________ Date: __________ Privacy: Shared · approved summaries only ## Instructions Name a human note owner and timekeeper. Obtain unanimous recording/transcription consent or keep recording off. Capture only approved personal summaries. Complete one success map per participant, then compare without forcing consensus. Every unresolved item needs an owner and a route to resolution. ## Fictional worked example — not Truffle facts Fictional: Alex wants 15 sustainable hours/week; Morgan wants a full-time build. Shared resonance: customer-led work. Difference: pace and availability. Open question Q1: can a part-time model meet the first customer promise? Owner Casey; evidence: delivery workload estimate; due before Day 3. Status: unresolved—not consensus. ## Blank worksheet ### Opening contract Date / facilitator / timekeeper / note owner. Confidentiality and sharing agreement. Recording and transcription consent from everyone (or off). Decisions and evidence rules. [Your response] ### Success map · Darren Approved summary only: five success conditions / what must be protected / contribution / non-negotiables / partnership fit / tensions or questions. [Your response] ### Success map · Graham Approved summary only: five success conditions / what must be protected / contribution / non-negotiables / partnership fit / tensions or questions. [Your response] ### Success map · Seth Approved summary only: five success conditions / what must be protected / contribution / non-negotiables / partnership fit / tensions or questions. [Your response] ### Shared resonance and differences map For each theme: reinforcing goals / differences / incompatible expectations / implications / agreement not yet reached. [Your response] ### Open-question register ID / question / why it matters / evidence needed / owner / due date / status / next decision forum. [Your response] ### Close and decision log Each person: energy / caution / trust / desire to continue. Each decision: decided / test approved / evidence owner and deadline / parked. Record dissent and privacy limits. [Your response] --- # Session 2 output · Partner compact **Session 2 output · Finalise together at the session’s close** During Session 2: the named note owner captures only approved summaries and provisional decisions. At the close: review this pack together, confirm agreement or record differences, check actions have owners and dates, and approve the shared version. The note owner then exports and circulates only that approved version. This pack is not a pre-work submission. Participant / note owner: __________ Date: __________ Privacy: Shared · approved summaries only ## Instructions Use a neutral human facilitator when available; otherwise scripted equal-time peer rounds. Nobody facilitates or adjudicates feedback about themselves. Hear all six partner-to-partner perspectives. The recipient owns, tests or carries an item; listening is not forced agreement. Capture commitments, not private raw feedback. ## Fictional worked example — not Truffle facts Fictional compact: Morgan will log changed decisions with reason and owner within one working day for 30 days. Evidence: decision log; measure: every changed decision logged on time; review: a named calendar date. Alex will flag capacity conflicts within one day. Their weekly 15-minute review checks behavior, not personality. ## Blank worksheet ### Safety and round plan Date / neutral facilitator or peer script / note owner / timekeeper / privacy and recording consent. Equal recipient time; no interruptions; clarify before responding. [Your response] ### Strengths map Darren / Graham / Seth: two strengths each, supporting observation, what must be protected in the operating model. [Your response] ### Feedback coverage and response For each of the six directed pairs: heard? recipient response (own / test / carry unresolved) / approved summary only. Record evidence requests separately; do not adjudicate memories. [Your response] ### Capacity truths Each person: sustainable hours / allocation / outside commitments / overlap windows / unavailable dates / desired role / excluded role / decision ownership / risk constraints. [Your response] ### Behavior commitments Person / observable behavior / business or relationship impact / specific replacement behavior / measure / start date / review date. Include clarity, presence, conflict handling and decision transparency symmetrically. [Your response] ### Thirty-day partner compact Commitment / owner / support needed / success measure / review date / reviewer / if missed, repair step. Set an actual calendar date; record unresolved conditions and consent. [Your response] ### Trust conditions and decision log Communication cadence / escalation route / response expectations / decisions or tests approved / parked issues / owner and deadline. Do not turn private feedback into shared notes without permission. [Your response] --- # Session 3 output · Tests, gate & Act II brief **Session 3 output · Finalise together at the session’s close** During Session 3: the named note owner captures only approved summaries and provisional decisions. At the close: review this pack together, confirm agreement or record differences, check actions have owners and dates, and approve the shared version. The note owner then exports and circulates only that approved version. This pack is not a pre-work submission. Participant / note owner: __________ Date: __________ Privacy: Shared · approved summaries only ## Instructions Begin with ownership, not rebuttal. Separate historical positions from current decisions. For each thesis distinguish evidence from belief. End with an explicit continuation decision and a bounded Act II brief; proceeding is not permission to spend, hire or make external commitments. ## Fictional worked example — not Truffle facts Fictional experiment E1: five buyer interviews on onboarding delays; Alex owns; 8-hour cap; due in two weeks; evidence is notes approved for synthesis. Pass: at least two buyers request a scoped paid pilot; fail: no buyer prioritizes the problem. Gate: narrow scope to discovery only until results are reviewed. No spending approved. ## Blank worksheet ### Ownership commitments Each person: what I heard / what I accept / what I will change / measurable evidence / review date / what remains unresolved. [Your response] ### January position register For each: founder-led selling; market-led pricing; lean operations; customer-valued technology; Makosi strengths. Record still true / changed / unclear / disagree, evidence, actual current decision, owner and deadline. [Your response] ### Agreed hard-thesis register ID / thesis / sponsor / supporting evidence with source/date / counter-evidence / confidence / agreement, disagreement or unresolved assumption / what changes our mind. [Your response] ### Bounded experiment slate ID / assumption / smallest test / owner / time and cost cap (approval needed separately) / evidence / pass and fail thresholds / deadline / review date / next action for each result. [Your response] ### Continuation decision Proceed to Act II / pause for partnership repair / narrow scope. Record rationale, each person’s position, dissent, conditions, owner, review date and what is explicitly NOT approved. [Your response] ### Act II design brief Purpose / customer and problem / scope in and out / required outputs / owner / participants / input evidence / dates / capacity constraints / approval gates / unresolved questions. [Your response] ### Founder-led sales decision list Named markets/accounts / minimum weekly founder selling capacity / US presence / pipeline targets / BDR support / pricing authority / evidence-based hiring or handoff trigger. Mark unresolved items with owner and date; do not invent agreement. [Your response] ### Makosi-pattern safeguards · 30/90 days Pattern to avoid / strength to preserve / observable safeguard / owner / measure / 30-day check / 90-day check. Cover customer priority, clear vision, direct conflict resolution, decision transparency, hiring quality, lean cost and customer-valued technology. [Your response] ### Final action and decision log Action or decision / status (decided, test approved, evidence needed, parked) / owner / deadline / evidence link / review forum / privacy approval. Name the next check-in. [Your response]